Multidimensional journal evaluation haustein stefanie. Stefanie Haustein « ISI 2015 2019-03-03

Multidimensional journal evaluation haustein stefanie Rating: 7,3/10 1004 reviews

[Beyond the impact factor. Reflections on the book of Stefanie Haustein].

multidimensional journal evaluation haustein stefanie

Research into peer-review rarely focuses on academic promotions, most often concentrating on the peer-review process for journals and grants instead. Because chosen social bookmarking systems are mostly used as web-based reference managers typically research papers are saved there. Academic journals should be careful to the process of peer-review and establish clear correction policies. These results inform the understanding of source-level impact assessment and knowledge diffusion. Bibliometrics is a high-demand and fast-growing statistical area for the analysis of scientific literature in a certain field.

Next

Multidimensional Journal Evaluation: Analyzing Scientific Periodicals beyond the Impact Factor20136Stefanie Haustein. Multidimensional Journal Evaluation: Analyzing Scientific Periodicals beyond the Impact Factor . Berlin: De Gruyter Saur 2012. 408 pp. €74.72 hard cover, ISBN: 9783110254945

multidimensional journal evaluation haustein stefanie

Findings — There is no difference between the databases in the presence of publication year data — all of them include this element for all the records. With energy intensity and emissions these positive processes are affected negatively by the financial crisis, causing temporary divergence. This paper provides such analysis, based on 45 million documents indexed in the Web of Science over the period 1973-2013. In addition, there were seven dental journals in Publindex. The model is interpreted to assist mental health professionals in designing and performing assessments for legal competencies defined in criminal and civil law, and to guide research that will improve the practice of evaluations for legal competencies. As a result, Danish and Spanish scholars are advised to contribute to journals of high 'authority' as in the former or those within a high class as in the latter.

Next

Multidimensional Journal Evaluation: Analyzing Scientific Periodicals beyond the Impact Factor20136Stefanie Haustein. Multidimensional Journal Evaluation: Analyzing Scientific Periodicals beyond the Impact Factor . Berlin: De Gruyter Saur 2012. 408 pp. €74.72 hard cover, ISBN: 9783110254945

multidimensional journal evaluation haustein stefanie

Traditional expert-oriented approaches are supplemented by organically-evolving user-generated approaches known as folksonomies. Uncontrolled vocabulary involves the risk of ambigui- ties. The present doctoral thesis answers these questions. Bibliography Includes bibliographical references and indexes. Although both have been investigated to discover whether they correlate with article citations, it is not known whether users tend to tweet or save in Mendeley the same kinds of articles that they cite. Our findings show that article views and downloads from online digital libraries or repositories are very well-known.

Next

[Beyond the impact factor. Reflections on the book of Stefanie Haustein].

multidimensional journal evaluation haustein stefanie

This guide presents several fundamental principles for the evaluation and selection of online resources in academic libraries. In one approach, an individual result record is linked to other article records on the basis of the number of references cited they share in common, the theory being that two articles that cite many of the same sources are likely to be highly similar in subject content. Traditionally, scholarly impact and visibility have been measured by counting publications and citations in the scholarly literature. Mendeley is particularly promising in this regard, although all data sources are not subjected to rigorous quality control and can be manipulated. The most important indicator to determine the influence of a journal is the Impact Factor. Zasady oceny czasopism naukowych wpisane w politykę naukową wyznaczają kierunki ich rozwoju, gdyż definiują, czym jest prestiż czasopisma.

Next

Stefanie Haustein « ISI 2015

multidimensional journal evaluation haustein stefanie

Conclusion: Reputable publishers have identified a market demand for publication of scholarly output and are offering their services using open access mega journals. The focus is on the validity and application of readership data as an impact indicator for academic publications across different disciplines. Rousseau, 2002; Thelwall, 2012; Waltman, 2016. The importance of considering research products and not just scientific publications is highlighted. The relationship between tweets and WoS citations was examined for each document at the level of journals and specialties. The investigation shows that Twitter is very frequently used to share content from other services like Instagram or YouTube. This book defines five dimensions, which build a framework for a multidimensional method of journal evaluation.

Next

Multidimensional journal evaluation : analyzing scientific periodicals beyond the impact factor (eBook, 2012) [www.zenga.tv]

multidimensional journal evaluation haustein stefanie

You now have a source you can cite with authority, confidence, and credibility. A big challenge is the problem of information overload. Wykaz jest wykorzystywany jako jedno z narzędzi ewaluacji jednostek naukowych parametryzacji , która z kolei powiązana jest ściśle z finansowaniem tych jednostek Kulczycki, 2014. The second was, how do reviewers justify their assessments their conclusions? Citation impact is generally low and, with the exception of a special issue on blogs, remains world average. Citation impact is generally low and, with the exception of a special issue on blogs, remains world average. Co-readership is a weaker indicator of subject similarity than co-citation, however Kraker, et al.

Next

Multidimensional journal evaluation : analyzing scientific periodicals beyond the impact factor (eBook, 2012) [www.zenga.tv]

multidimensional journal evaluation haustein stefanie

The author recommends redefining the role of assessment criteria for academic advancement, reducing their number, and adapting them to so that they apply better to social sciences and humanities. A special feature is the book's evaluative review of specialized forensic assessment instruments for each of several legal competencies. Specifically, it addresses the distinction between students' wants and needs, the primacy of content, the importance of comparative assessments, the advantages of title-by-title selection, and the need for resource coherence by subject or function. According to Leydesdorff and Rafols 2009 , subject categories cannot be considered as literary warrant Chan, 1999 like the Library of Congress Classification. These new relations lead to new recommendations for the target, who is made aware of new possible research partners and networks, out of which communities of practice can develop. This paper presents the findings of an online survey, which are the results of the first phase data collection of a user survey on the awareness and usage of altmetrics in academia.

Next

Multidimensional journal evaluation : analyzing scientific periodicals beyond the impact factor (Book, 2012) [www.zenga.tv]

multidimensional journal evaluation haustein stefanie

The consolidation of the scientific publishing industry has been the topic of much debate within and outside the scientific community, especially in relation to major publishers' high profit margins. Using this measure, it is feasible to benchmark this index against the other citation indexes for acceptance criteria. Finally, the findings in these studies are then brought together in the main case study, which carries out the model for expert recommendation proposed in this work. The E-mail message field is required. Exploring the challenges faced by principals, as well as the impact of new managerial tactics being employed, this book is a comprehensive reference publication for policymakers, academicians, researchers, students, school practitioners, and government officials seeking current and emerging research on administrative leadership in educational settings. Fifteen years ago the journal Food Quality and Preference was fairly new.

Next

Multidimensional Journal Evaluation

multidimensional journal evaluation haustein stefanie

The first pre-study discusses the structure of bookmarking data and the difference of similarity metrics regarding user recommendation. We analyzed linking behavior in blog posts and tweets, number of comments assigned to blog posts and share of publications found in social bookmarking systems. Based on an examination of subject categories in Journal Citation Report, this paper finds that social science domains tend to be more self-contained and thus it is more difficult for knowledge from other domains to flow into them; at the same time, knowledge from science domains, such as biomedicine-, chemistry-, and physics-related domains can access and be accessed by other domains more easily. They represent a wide range of theoretical approaches and were written by a diverse array of professionals, including social workers, psychologists, nurses, physicians, and sociologists. Because of a relatively low rejection rate of 31%, its openness towards a multitude of different research areas, an internationally large peer review community, and its open access, a plurality of documents can be published in comparison with a print-journal or other online periodicals.

Next

Multidimensional journal evaluation : analyzing scientific periodicals beyond the impact factor in SearchWorks catalog

multidimensional journal evaluation haustein stefanie

The original impact factor used two year time periods but five year time periods are also used. To assess this data as specifically as possible and to address all relevant factors, the evaluation is split into five dimensions, each of which involves distinct metrics. The most important indicator to determine the influence of a journal is the Impact Factor. This paper also finds that social science domains are more disunified than science domains, as three fifths of the knowledge paths from one social science domain to another need at least one science domain to serve as an intermediate. We take advantage of a comprehensive bibliographic and citation dataset of about 2.

Next